Showing posts with label General Motors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General Motors. Show all posts

Friday, May 24, 2024

The Biggest Product Failure Of All Time: Saturn. 1996 SW1 Wagon

So it's 1996, and GM's Saturn brand sells 226,000 cars, a little less than the brand's peak sales of 286,000 in 1994. Now in the car's 7th model year, a lot of things have already gone wrong. And it's all downhill from here.

The idea of Saturn was that GM was going to finally build a small car good enough to compete with Japanese brands, and, simultaneously, create a revolution in the way GM built and sold cars. The new Saturn factory was a place where management and labor would have a groundbreaking cooperative relationship, and the car would be sold with no-haggle pricing.

So did it all work? Not really.
* GM had promised that Saturn cars would have extraordinary new engines; as good or better than anything ever put in a small car. The reality was that Saturn engines were simple and loud.
* Saturn was selling about half as many cars as GM had hoped. And remember, GM had invested $5 billion (or about $12 billion in 2024 dollars) to make it all happen. Well heck, it should be no trick for the world's largest carmaker to design, build and sell 200,000 inexpensive compact cars. But there's never been another company like GM to burn through insane amounts of money due to its bloated management hierarchies.



 

 

 

 

 

 

And like I said, 1996 is when times were comparatively GOOD for Saturn. In a few years, the brand would be gone. So what else happened?
* GM's other six divisions were livid that most of the company's money was being poured into Saturn, and started demanding their fair share.
* GM had originally bragged about Saturn cars receiving frequent updates. In reality it took a decade for anything new to show up. And when the new Saturns were introduced, it was clear that the brand's distinctiveness was over. The larger L-Series introduced in 2000 was built by bolting Saturn's plastic body panels over a car from GM's German Opel brand. And the replacement for the smaller S-Series, the Ion, was also built on a platform shared by GM's other brands. (Also, in 2006 I drove an Ion from Florida to Texas, and was stunned by what a piece of junk it was.)
* By the 2000's, Americans were buying fewer small cars. Bad news for a brand that makes nothing but small cars.
* Soon, all kinds of off-brand (and unwanted) vehicles started showing up in Saturn showrooms. A 7-seater SUV? Sure, what not?

GM's 2009 bankruptcy provided an excuse to put the brand out of its misery. From cubsideclassic.com, "It’s been estimated that the whole Saturn fiasco lost as much as $12 billion. One of the biggest industrial blunders and losses ever; the Edsel of the modern era."















Tuesday, August 30, 2022

2022 Greenwood Car Show: General Motors

After a two-year absence, the Greenwood Car Show is back and the weather was perfect. I'm going to do all my favorites in a few posts. Here are the GM cars.

I think this 1969 Camaro SS is a "tribute" car. It's done up like the very rare Camaro SS 427 sold by Yenko Chevrolet, but I see a number of things about it that don't look authentic.

 
1969 Pontiac GTO.








 


1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS 396. This looks completely authentic.










1970 Oldmobile F-85 Cutlass Rallye 350. A budget muscle car featuring GM's forced air induction system (makes car go fast).

   
1970 Oldsmobile 442. Top of the line.

 
A rare 1957 Chevrolet delivery sedan.

 
1957 Chevrolet Bel Air.

 
1967 Pontiac GTO.

   
1955 Chevrolet Bel Air

 
Probably the most desirable Sting Ray. 1963 split-window coupe with fuel injection.


 
1967 and 1968 Camaros. The convertibles have the Rally Sport package, denoted by the hidden headlights.



 
1962 Chevrolet Corvette.

 
1967 Pontiac GTO.

 
1969 Pontiac Firebird.

 
1954 Pontiac. Sometime around August 1954, GM built its very last straight-8 engine.




Friday, March 5, 2021

No wonder the communists called us 'decadent' - 1958 Oldsmobile 88

They say form should follow function. Well, apparently General Motors of 1958 did not agree. The design of this Oldsmobile suggests they asked ten people where they should bolt chrome pieces from a Buck Rogers spaceship onto the car, then they accepted all ten suggestions.

Almost everything about GM's 1958 cars were unique to that year. Despite the designs being all-new for '58, GM immediately decided to scrap them and copy Chrysler's "Forward Look" cars. Those cars, lead by the '57 Plymouth, were lower, slimmer, and somewhat less tarted-up with a lot of ridiculous chrome doo-dads.
















Wednesday, July 17, 2019

1993 Chevrolet Lumina

General Motors was once the largest, wealthiest and most admired company in the world. What went wrong in the years leading to the company's 2009 bankruptcy? Many, many things went wrong. And those mistakes are reflected in surviving copies of GM's products.

From curbsideclassic.com: "Despite its name, the Lumina failed to bring any light to those dark years at GM when it arrived. The Lumina was a desperate effort to play catch-up with Ford’s runaway hit Taurus as well as to parry with the Camry and Accord; the result was predictably dim. It instantly joined its smaller brother Corsica as the very icons of  fleet queens, a title its W-Body successors defended right to the present. Did they have redeeming qualities? Undoubtedly; but I’m hardly the one to ask. Try Hertz."

"GM’s W-Body started out as the GM10, which got off to miserable start with the 1988 Buick Regal, Olds Cutlass Supreme and Pontiac Grand Prix coupes. The whole GM10 program was quite likely the single biggest boondoggle of the Roger Smith era; their development cost a mind-boggling $7 billion ($13 billion adjusted), and the goal was to build these cars in seven plants at 250,000 units per year per plant; in other words, a 21% share of the total US market. What were they smoking? Soon enough, GM would be fighting for a 21% market share for the whole company, never mind mid-sized cars.

The enormous sunk costs and subsequent pathetic sales meant that GM was losing some $2000 per car on these at the time the Lumina made its belated appearance for 1990. The old saw that GM lost money on its small cars because it had to build them to meet CAFE targets isn’t nearly encompassing enough. When asked by Fortune why GM10 was such a catastrophe, Smith replied, “I don’t know. It’s a mysterious thing.”(wikipedia)"

How long has it been since you've seen a mid-90s Lumina on the road? Quite a while, I'm guessing? And how long since you saw a mid-90s Toyota Camry? Probably this morning?